TOXIC CHEMICALS AND DRINKING WATER
(Page 7 of 7)
Unfortunately, at the root of the EPA's inability to
adequately insure the safety of drinking water is a lack of
reliable data on just how much of a particular substance
presents a given degree of health hazard. (Of course, the
degree of hazard that's acceptable is another
question entirely.) However, lacking information on which
to base regulations, the EPA seems to have chosen
to take no action at all.
RELATED CONTENT
Your woodstove can heat more than your home. This hot water heating system uses extra heat to produ...
There are several types of solar water heating systems. Learn more using solar energy to heat water...
Laid-up masonry basement walls on concrete footers are sturdy, economical, and comparatively simple...
On-demand water heaters provide an “endless supply” of hot water, but are they really “green”? Ther...
Looking for a way to avoid grasshopper damage in your garden without chemical pesticides? Introduce...
In the opinion of many environmentalists, though, "evidence
of no hazard" is considerably different from "no evidence
of hazard" . . . and the question can be reduced
essentially to whether we wish to err on the side of safety
or of commercial expedience. Organizations that benefit
from liberal pollution standards (not only industry, but
also public waste facilities and waterworks) exert a
tremendous amount of influence in Washington. The only way
the other side will be heard is if you raise your voice!
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 | 7 |