THE ENVIRONMENTALIST AND THE BOMB UPDATE: DAVE BROWER
(Page 3 of 8)
However, whether you agree with my route toward
disarmament or not, the fact is that we do have to get rid
of nuclear weapons somehow. But still more than that is
required. We have to ask, as Moorhead C. Kennedy, Jr. puts
it, "What are you saving the earth for , not just
from ?" We need to outline what we want our planet
to be like and how we'll all manage to live on it
sustainably. If we can come up with those scenarios, it's
going to be easier to disarm in the first place.
RELATED CONTENT
A Plowboy Interview with Paul Ehrlich, author, biologist and environmentalist, who with his wife, A...
Lyme disease is a real bummer. If left untreated, it can lead to painful, swollen joints, chronic f...
An interview with Michael Tobias about the dangers of global overpopulation....
A Plowboy Interview with an outspoken opponent of strip mining and a staunch supporter of Appalachi...
Right now, the world's economic systems heavily discount
the future. Instead, the superpowers are in a growth race
as well as an arms race. The vigorous growing economy all
our leaders keep exhorting us to produce is simply not
eternally possible on an earth of fixed size, and
continuing attempts to produce such growth constitute
the basic threat to peace. So we need a blueprint
for an economy that will endure in peaceful stability . . .
that will not require the war with the environment that
leads to war with fellow humans.
Now I'm not saying all growth is bad. The key
question is, "What kinds of growth must we have
and what kinds can we no longer afford ?" I think
if you wrote down the two answers to that question, you'd
find that the first list would be a fairly short one, and
the second very long. We should treat the matter the way
nature does. In spring there's a great deal of promise of
vigorous new growth, and that's good. We're going to need
it. Throughout summer the growth is exploding, and by fall
its yield is harvested. But then winter comes and the world
undergoes a very severe editing. What is no longer needed
won't show up again. Editing out the things that must not
come back is what we've forgotten to do with our economy.
We do need growth, a new blossoming every so often . . .
but we also need to balance that off with what we let die.
We need to stop building roads and dams . . . we already
have plenty of those. We need to quit destroying wild
places . . . we need all the ones we've got left. We who
live in America need to stop using so many "advanced"
lifestyle trinkets ... we're creating almost half the
world's resource drain. And everyone needs to work to halt
— nay, to reverse — the global population
increase. I'd be happy to "grandfather clause" all the
people who are alive now, but those who aren't here yet
should quit arriving in such large numbers.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Next >>