Friends Of The Earth
(Page 4 of 4)
We mention this to give you another version of the rosy
picture still being painted by many proponents of nuclear
energy. The fact is that atomic power's
contribution—to our energy needs slipped last year
(from about 12% to 10%) and would have come in last if oil
hadn't slipped even further.
RELATED CONTENT
A Portable Environment, A Portable Environment, or...How To Survive The Ice Age, In Comfort! Januar...
A Plowboy Interview with William Ophuls whose 1973 Ph.D. dissertation was on the management of poli...
On October 15, blogs around the world are writing about environmental issues. We are, too!...
Energy & Environment October/November 2002
For cruising or commuting...
Building and installing an alternative energy solar panel on the roof of a house or pole, including...
However, figures like these fail to consider conservation,
which—in its own way—has contributed at least
as much to solving our energy problems as has nuclear power
or oil. In fact, despite the pronouncements of the
supply-side energy types, conservation is today's most
economical way of augmenting future supplies of energy.
WELCOME BACK
We're exceedingly pleased to be offering this column to
readers of THE MOTHER EARTH NEWS ® . In forthcoming
issues we'll be discussing other topics that we think will
be vitally important to everyone who's concerned with our
environment. If you'd like to challenge (or elaborate on)
any of the items reported in the column—or to ask any
questions that we might be able to answer—write to
us: Friends of the Earth. Dept. TMEN. 124 Spear Street, San
Francisco, California 94105
EDITOR'S NOTE: To become a member of Friends
of the Earth—and receive. the excellent
monthly publication Not Man Apart—remit $25
($12 for students and re tired people), or $15 for
a subscription only, to FOE at the address above.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 | 4 |