ECOSCIENCE BY ANNE AND PAUL EHRLICH
Paying the high price for energy, including fossil fuels, nuclear energy, renewable sources, comparing and choosing options.
Paul Ehrlich (Bing Professor of Population Studies and
Professor of Biological Sciences, Stanford University) and
Anne Ehrlich (Senior Research Associate, Department of
Biological Sciences, Stanford) are familiar names to
ecologists and environmentalists everywhere. As well they
should be. Because it was Paul and Anne who —
through their writing and research —
gave special meaning to the words "population",
"resources", and "environment" in the late 1960's. (They
also coined the term coevolution , and did a lot
to make ecology the household word it is today.) But while
most folks are aware of the Ehrlichs' popular writing in
the areas of ecology and overpopulation (most of us
— for instance — have read Paul's
book The Population Bomb ) . . . far too few
people have any idea of how deeply the Ehrlichs are
involved in ecological research (research of the type that
tends to be published only in technical journals and
college textbooks.) That's why it pleases us to be able to
present — on a regular basis — the following
semi-technical column by authors/ecologists/educators Anne
and Paul Ehrlich.
RELATED CONTENT
A Portable Environment, A Portable Environment, or...How To Survive The Ice Age, In Comfort! Januar...
A new study predicts we could have one quarter of our energy needs from renewable sources by 2025, ...
Learn about the declining bat population of the Carlsbad Caverns, The United State's increased defe...
Missouri creates a stronger market for renewable energy by passing a clean energy initiative....
Join renewable energy researchers around the world and follow this year's World Renewable Energy Fo...
ENERGY: THERE AIN'T NO FREE LUNCH
Nothing enrages the oil companies' publicity hacks more
than the statement we've often made: "Giving inexpensive
and abundant energy to Americans today would be like giving
a machine gun to an idiot child." However, that view
— as much as it may conflict with the corporate
cheerfulness of the multinationals — simply reflects
our own concern about the energy-intensive assaults that
this society has launched (and continues to launch) upon
Earth's life-support systems (for a detailed discussion of
such problems, see "The Snail Darter and Us" in MOTHER NO.
57, page 128).
If humanity hopes to preserve the planet's vital
interrelated support systems (instead of paving them over
or plowing them under), two important decisions must be
made: How much energy should we mobilize, and how
should we mobilize it? Such decisions can be intelligently
made, however, only if one has a complete understanding of
the costs that accompany the benefits of each
energy technology.
It's a well-known economic principle that "there ain't no
such thing as a free lunch" . . . and that maxim applies to
the energy field as well. No source of energy — no
matter how clean or abundant it may be — comes
without its costs, which must be taken into consideration
right along with the technology's positive
effects. So, to guide you in the continuing debate over
energy use, we'd like to present a "score card" of the
liabilities of a number of potential power sources.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Next >>