Cows & Cooking & Crafts. . . B J O'S Way

Enlarge Image Image Gallery

Article Tools

Image Gallery

Print

E-mail

Comments

RSS

I just recently discovered THE MOTHER EARTH NEWS ® when I made a cross-country trip to Ohio, MOTHER's birthplace. Since then, I've ordered all the back issues and have been joyously reading MOM first thing when I wake in the morning. This long letter is because I have a "mizzerable cold" in my head and am too restless to stay in bed. I should be putting the energy to work cleaning house (my housekeeping has been termed "chore-to-chore failsmanship"), but . . . .

A comment about cows by Howard Garrett (in MOTHER NO, 19, pg. 112) has really been bothering me. Howard says, in effect, "Normally, more than half our herd of 200 have mastitis. " Wow! All my farming relatives plus my own experience on a farm tell me that there's something very wrong with an operation where more than 10% of a herd comes down with anything. Either Howard has too many cows for the amount of help he has, or he's doing something drastically wrong.

Basically, you should never have more cattle than you can "strip". It seems as if Howard is depending on modern technology to do this for him . . . a bad mistake. Nobody should ever depend completely on a machine for stripping a cow (big operations do, but they can afford to replace animals that get into trouble, or sell off the mastitis-prone ones as hamburger). It only takes a second or two on each teat to strip the last of the milk from an animal (using a stroking movement of the thumb and forefinger), and a machine unlike a human, can't gently but firmly massage down the bag. A sort of "bumping" much as a calf would do can help accomplish this chore.

But, and I suspect that this is the real problem, has Howard taken into account the socialorder of his herd? Aside from TV networks and government hierarchies, there is no greater adherence to the pecking order than that found in a herd of cattle. Two cows can be friends. Add a third, and a "social status" immediately goes into effect ... absolutely guaranteed.

Cattle set up a firm, unbreakable (unless the lead cow dies or is removed from the herd permanently) social order ... and if a human lets it get disarranged, the entire contingent will hold back on milk and give themselves mastitis. Removing bossy from the group won't solve anything. If she's within sight, sound or smell of the others, they'll hold her spot for her.

I've seen novice farmers trying to willy-nilly muster their cattle through a gate to the barn . . . without the Number One cow in front. You may be able to force the animals through the gate by shouting and beating and carrying on but they'll mill around and shy and do anything possible to get that lead cow through first. And she has her stall. Run another animal in there and you have two set up for mastitis (bossy because she's uptight about having her place usurped, and the other because she knows she's going to get it next day, when you herd them out to pasture). If Howard is running 200 cows into his barn each night and using different stalls each time . . . well, the confusion and mental turmoil among the cattle guarantees mastitis.

RSS | Comments | E-mail | Print