OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON

Kiernan reports on the yawning of America, Humphrey, the happy warrior, and the Congress' Dirty Dozen.

Article Tools
by MIKE KIERNAN

THE YAWNING OF AMERICA

The greening of America — for a lot of people — began in 1970 with the first Earth Day. A new awareness took root together with a new commitment to preserve America's environment. But two years later one finds a prospective garden of delights filled with political bramblebrush.

Something has happened . . . in the important, necessary process of moving from the streets to the courts and to endless Congressional subcommittee hearings, the environmental movement has sputtered to a slow drum roll.

There are exceptions, of course. In West Virginia, for example, strip mining became the number one issue in the recent Democratic primaries. In one race after another, locally and state-wide, citizens issued a mandate against the coal-producing industry and the United Mine Workers. Among the victors were two important environmental advocates — Congressman Ken Heckler and gubernatorial candidate John D. Rockefeller.

But what happened in West Virginia last May is not likely to happen nationally this fall. While activists in Washington continue valiantly to maintain that preserving the environment can be a potent national issue in November, one senses across the country a long, tiresome yawn.

Such indifference will become apparent in the race for the presidency. Never before has a national debate on the state of the environment appeared so necessary. A whole range of issues demand discussion . . . from automobile pollution to phosphate detergents. The Energy Crisis alone could generate enough topics for weekly debates among the candidates from now until November . . . what are we going to do about that pipeline in Alaska or that experimental atomic breeder reactor down south or oil shale out west or that gigantic hot-air plant at Four Corners, New Mexico?

But on these questions and others one can expect little but lip service from the candidates.

Why? "It's Nixon," one political analyst told MOTHER, "He's made the question of preserving the environment boring for the voters and suicidal for the Democrats. Look at Muskie. He went to Ohio and talked about saving Lake Erie. He went to Florida and talked about saving Big Cypress. And he got nowhere, The people don't seem that interested. The real issue this year is jobs, then truth in government, then welfare, then the war . . , the environment is way back on this list."

I talked to a dozen other political forecasters in and outside the environmental movement who echoed the same opinion, "On the national level Nixon has handled the environmental issue brilliantly," said one. "He has done just enough to convince the average voter that we are now backing away from the brink of ecological disaster . . . and he has done just enough to avoid a serious challenge from either McGovern or Humphrey — neither of whom have the credentials as environmentalists."

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >>