CALLING ALL CAULICARROTS
(Page 3 of 3)
Sounds convenient, but what about accuracy? The Clinicard
doesn't give results exact enough for a doctor's diagnosis,
says the FDA. It does, however, give readings within three
ranges: below 200 mg/dl (desirable level), 200 to 300
(borderline to high), and above. (The cards show 25 mg/dl
gradations.) Manufacturers say the home kits are only
screening devices, and not meant to replace lab tests
(which are deemed "accurate" if they're within 150% of the
true reading).
RELATED CONTENT
WORKING UP TO IT (A GUIDE FOR WOMEN AND MEN) May/June 1982 Heading the following advice might help ...
200-plus women assemble in Atlanta, Georgia to make a positive statement about their right to equal...
Inherited obesity: A fat woman's womb may nudge her children toward becoming obese later on...
THE HEALTHY PLATE: Recipe for Spiral Pasta with Roasted Pumpkin and Plum Tomatoes...
Red Zinger September/October 1978 Bicycles, as most everyone knows, are fun . . . and the two-wheel...
Gene-Therapy Taboos
Gene-Therapy Taboos Long ago, gene doctors agreed that gene
therapy on fertilized eggs and embryos was off limits as
far as humans are concerned. Reason: Once a gene is
inserted into a fertilized egg, it becomes incorporated
into every cell —including the sex cells. And that
means the extra gene would be passed on to all future
progeny—even offspring that don't need it.
(Sanctioned gene-therapy would always target specific
tissue to eliminate any and all possibilities of novel
genes being passed on to future generations.)
Even though animal studies suggest that doctors could, for
example, eventually wipe out insulin-dependent (type I)
diabetes by inserting an insulin-producing gene in embryos,
scientists worldwide have agreed not to try. The risk of
mucking up the human gene pool is simply too high.
Another gene-therapy taboo is "eugenic" genetic
engineering. That line of research would involve
genetically altering such traits as intelligence,
personality and organ formation. But rest assured, says a
National Academy of Sciences report, these traits are
controlled by hundreds, perhaps thousands, of interacting
genes. "The genes involved have not been identified.
Furthermore, scientists do not have the tools to manipulate
these complex traits, and do not expect to have them in the
foreseeable future."
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |