Dr. Harold W. Manner: The Man Who Cures Cancer
(Page 8 of 12)
November/December 1978
By Bruce Woods
These agencies, you see, wanted me to go through the normal scientific channels-which I had always used in the past but I had a specific reason for not doing so this time. I wasn't about to play games with cancer. It would have taken approximately two years to clear the various medical journal editors, and another two or three for a laboratory to pick up my studies and repeat them. That's four-maybe five-years, and I submit to you that the cancer patients living today don't have five years! If I had it to do again I would do exactly as I've done... in spite of the American Cancer Society.
RELATED CONTENT
A Plowboy Interview with Dr. Michael Fox, a spokesperson of the animal welfare movement and opposed...
A Plowboy Interview with Ernest Friedrich Schumacher, founder of the economical model - the Interme...
A Plowboy Interview with Dr. Robert Nara who believes that dentists should spend more time on preve...
A Plowboy Interview with Dr. Kelley—an orthodontist by training—who developed the concepts of metab...
PLOWBOY: Has the AMA, FDA, or American Cancer Society made any attempts to attack your research on scientific grounds?
DR. MANNER: I doubt that they can, because I suspect that-by this time-somebody at the government level in one of their labs has said, "Hey, this guy is too damaging, let's repeat his experiments." I'm sure they have repeated them, and I'm sure they've had the same results.
PLOWBOY: Which brings us back to the question of why the official organizations and agencies still oppose this kind of work.
DR. MANNER: I honestly don't know the answer to that. I also don't know why, for examble--even if what we're doing here is all wrong-an organization like the Cancer Society, which claims to be at the forefront of research, hasn't come out here to see what we've got . . . to find out if our work is worth anything or not. We've actually invited them over, and gotten no response . . . not a peep.
PLOWBOY: In what directions are the "legitimate" cancer research organizations going?
DR. MANNER: Basically, they're spending about half their money identifying new carcinogens . . . and there's nothing wrong with that. But I think they're on shaky ground because they also continually develop new chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation treatments that don't seem to do anything but kill the body they're used on. I'd think they might be willing-especially considering the results we've gotten-to take one percent of their donations and give it to nutrition research to see if that approach can do any good. But they won't, they won't open themselves up at all.
PLOWBOY: Your results are all the more impressive because you didn't have the help of the government cancer researchers. But can your experiments be applied to real life? How-in other words-can your work help a person who has cancer now?
The staffs of Whitestone General in New York City and American International in Zion, Illinois-for example
-have `come over' to laetrile/nutrition therapy. We're gradually making inroads.
DR. MANNER: Well, say a woman reads this interview-or hears me speak somewhere-and that woman has a burning lump in her breast. Already, in many cases, such people have gone to their physicians and said, "Before we use surgery, let me try this Manner technique." I've had more phone calls from irate surgeons because of that than you'd believe.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 | 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Next >>