ROPE KNOW-HOW
(Page 2 of 5)
SYNTHETIC VS. NATURAL
RELATED CONTENT
For a truly herbal shampoo, try this easy recipe for homemade shampoo made with yucca. Find out how...
If your hair color is looking a little tarnished, color your hair with one of these natural hair co...
Medical Self-Care: The Seven Rules of Self-Care
Seven laws for better health, including home...
How to build a simple device that easily turns bailing twine into rope....
A Plowboy Interview with William Ophuls whose 1973 Ph.D. dissertation was on the management of poli...
From a utilitarian point of view, synthetic fiber ropes
have a number of advantages over natural lines. For a given
diameter, they are stronger, more resistant to most types
of decay, and only slightly more expensive than the
nonsynthetics.
Such "artificial" lines are, for the most part,
manufactured from by-products of the oil refining process,
and therefore depend upon nonrenewable raw materials. (In
fact, polyethylene ropes are made from ethylene, a
petroleum substance that can also be used to produce ethyl
alcohol, or fuel ethanol.) Compounds obtained from the
hydrocarbons are extruded and drawn, and—depending
upon the fastidiousness: of the production process can be
formed into threads that extend for the entire length of a
rope (a feature not possible with natural fibers). The
finest nylon lines are made by this "continuous filament"
method, and are easy to distinguish from the fuzzier "spun"
nylon ropes.
Despite the advantages of synthetic fibers, many folks
still prefer the relatively strong, easy-to-handle,
economical natural lines. Manila is the most popular of the
plant-derived ropes (it comes from abaca, a bananalike
plant). In fact, among seafarers (and landlubbers) who do
fancy work with rope, manila is considered the only choice.
A less preferred-and less expensive-option is sisal, which
takes its raw materials from a species of Mexican cactus.
And hemp, which was once a common top-quality rope made
from fibers in the stems of Cannabis (marijuana) plants,
has become quite difficult to find.
The relative strengths of the-common natural and synthetic
ropes (as well as their resistance to the elements and
their stretch, cost, etc.) are compared in the chart that
accompanies this article. (It is important to note that the
performance of two firms' versions of the same kind of rope
is likely to vary more than will the performance of two
different kinds from the same manufacturer. Be sure to
check the factory specifications, which will be available
for many quality ropes.)
For general farmstead needs, the two most useful types of
line are manila and nylon. The former has very little
stretch, takes knots well without slipping, and can easily
be spliced and employed in permanent applications. Nylon,
on the other hand, has a significantly higher breaking
strength than any other common rope, and has a tremendous
ability to stretch and absorb shock loads. In addition,
it's unaffected by water, sunlight, and alkaline chemicals
and is very easy to handle.
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >>