HOT TOPICS >> Gas prices • Natural Cooling • Sunburn • Allergies • Bug bites

Save Gas, Save Money, Save the Earth

gas price gouging, gas prices, cheap gas, gas mileage, fuel economy, fuel economy car, fuel economy vehicle
The natural-gas powered Honda Civic GX was named the most environmentally friendly 2005 vehicle by ACEEE. For information on the refueling appliance shown here, visit www.myphill.com.
COURTESY HONDA
Article Tools
Buckle up, America ? the era of cheap oil is over. Whether the road ahead for gas prices will be a steep climb or a slow incline is anyone's guess. But don't expect to see gas prices drop below $2 a gallon ever again. Odds are you're already feeling the pinch of this trend as gas prices skyrocketed given high demand versus low supply.


Drive a more fuel-efficient vehicle, however, and you can save a substantial amount of money. Even if gas goes back to $2.20 a gallon, annual gas expenses for a car that gets 25 miles per gallon (mpg) will total about $1,320. Switch to a 35-mpg car, though, and you'll save $377 a year; a 50-mpg hybrid will save you $660 a year. Over a five-year period, your savings will add up to $1,886 and $3,300, respectively.

There also are benefits greater than saving money. 'Choosing which vehicle to drive is one of, if not the, most important environmental decisions a person can make,' says James Kliesch, principal vehicle analyst for the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) and lead author of ACEEE's annual environmental guide to cars and trucks.

A more fuel-efficient vehicle will also reduce your contribution to global warming. The more gas a vehicle burns, the more it emits carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas that traps the Earth's heat and plays a leading role in climate change.

For example, a 25-mpg vehicle emits 11,640 pounds of CO2 a year. A 35-mpg vehicle emits 3,326 fewer pounds of CO2 each year; a 50-mpg hybrid releases 5,820 fewer pounds annually.

The type of fuel also impacts its greenhouse gas emissions. Diesel fuel produces more CO2 than gasoline, whereas natural gas and E85 (85-percent ethanol, 15-percent gasoline) produce less.

As with air pollution, the Environmental Protection Agency also provides a greenhouse gas score for every vehicle model. The rating ranges from zero to 10 ? the higher the number, the less greenhouse gases the vehicle emits. To view these scores for the most fuel-efficient vehicles visit the Alternative Transportation Page.

23 Comments

  • PAUL Cross 10/3/2006 12:00:00 AM

    I don't really care about the environment. I waste
    gas,water,electricity,and paper. Who cares if the earth gets
    damaged years and years after we are all dead? It's not my
    problem.

  • JANAKI Blum 9/17/2006 12:00:00 AM

    The article talks about cars only. Perhaps promoting a walking
    culture (with attendent transit-oriented development) would cut
    down gas consumption quite a bit.

  • TOM Beasley 8/30/2006 12:00:00 AM

    KrazyKyngeKorny,My response was intended for VBunton's comment
    before your’s (“ People can not and do not cause climate changes”).
    Your comment was posted before I uploaded my response to VBunton's
    comment. You post didn’t show up on my screen until after my
    upload. I support your comment - “Global harming IS a big issue,
    and it is happening due to fossil feul usag”- 100%. Sorry about the
    misunderstanding.

  • RAY KORNELE 8/30/2006 12:00:00 AM

    >>Sorry about the
    misunderstanding.<<S'alright!KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not
    stupid)

  • RAY KORNELE 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    >>It is not helpful to contribute to the myth about globel
    harming.<<Lying about the evils of air pollution leads to
    those who believe you, ignoring their bad habits- and those of
    others.KrazyKyngeKorny (Just krazy. Not stupid)

  • RAY KORNELE 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    >>ethanol has improved the environment to
    boot.<<But, the message to which I posted implied that this
    is lies. I simply said otherwise. Here, you call ME a liar by
    aggreing with me. Please read what you are replying to before you
    reply. It will make you look far less foolish.Global harming IS a
    big issue, and it is happening due to fossil feul usage.Thank you
    for confirming my comment.KrazyKyngeKorny (Just krazy. Not
    stupid)

  • Wes Williams 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    I work and live in China. I have the choice to purchase a gas
    vehicle or electric. I have decided on the electric. Yes the
    battery will need to be properly despose of and that can be done by
    any of the electric bike dealer in Yantai. The range on the bike is
    only about 16 miles, but the electric scooter gets about 25 miles.
    For the bike I will buy an extra battery to get around on and not
    have to stop long to change. I think more bikes (peddle or
    electric) would be used in the cities if the autorities would make
    better bike lanes and wider ones. Let the city tax the gas
    vehicles. The system is there already. Just use the cameras at the
    stop lights to check the license each day. Tax by the week. Tax by
    the month. Tax by the date. If I have to go into the city on my
    license plate day and it is not important, I would not
    drive.

  • TOM Beasley 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    Was that supposed to be a joke?Brazilian ethanol know-how came
    about due their dependency on foreign oil. Brazil once was a
    imported oil dependent nation like the U.S.A. Their balance of
    payments were far more out of wack than ours because they imported
    so much oil (we too import more oil than we drill). When they
    switched to ethanol, Brazilians were eventually able to shake their
    dependency on foreign oil. Besides helping to improve Brazil’s
    balance of payments deficit, ethanol has improved the environment
    to boot. Ethanol, when burned in an internal combustion engine,
    produces considerably less CO2 than petrol (gasoline) and C O2 is
    one of the primary greenhouse gases we have to worry about .
    (continued on next post)

  • TOM Beasley 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    (continued from last post)Ethanol not only could help our
    balance of payments deficit and produce less CO2, it could help
    change our foreign policy, too. Anything that frees us of our
    addiction to middle-eastern oil will have a side benefit of
    eliminating our need to send our military into harms way in that
    area.If we spend a very small fraction of the money that is
    currently being spent in Iraq on the development of better
    electrical storage devices (batteries?), we could have an
    electrical powered car that would go further and cost a whole lot
    less to run. Electrical power is still far more efficient than
    gasoline powered, fuel cell powered, hybrid powered automobiles. It
    also produces far less pollution ( dead battery disposal
    notwithstanding) than any other form of power. It is also much
    easier to control pollution from a stationary producer (i.e. power
    plant) than mobile ones (automobiles).Finally, when I was in junior
    high school, President Kennedy set as a national goal for this
    country to place a man on the moon before the end of that decade.
    We achieved that goal and we could do the same again with global
    warming. The longer we put off doing it, the more it will cost but
    rest assured, we will have to deal with the problem sooner or
    later. If you still don’t think it’s a problem, talk to the Eskimos
    in Alaska who are having their homes sink into the sea as the polar
    ice caps melt. The days of having a devil may care attitude about
    the environment are over. If you have a problem with that, get over
    it, get with it or get counseling.

  • VERNETTA Bunton 8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM

    It is not helpful to contribute to the myth about globel
    harming. People can not and do not cause climate changes.

  • Scotch 8/27/2006 12:00:00 AM

    >> plastic is made from oil> Plastic is made from the
    by-products of oil- > what will not crach into gasoline. It has
    no > effect on the gasoline market.*laughs*>> I get 50 mpg
    driving to work in my 1997 Geo > Metro> Very likely But,
    that's not a Hummer, or big > engine 4wheel drive (which are
    gaining in > numbers).SUV sales are WAY down, as are trucks.IMO,
    driving an old car that gets 50 (or 40, or 30, for that matter) MPG
    is really the best way to cut both personal expense and impact to
    the environment, as long as the running gear and smog equiment is
    kept in good running order. Bravo, MHagle! :)>> believing
    that a few million SUV drivers in >> the US has that large of
    an effect on >> world-wide oil prices is short-sighted at
    best> No, believing that increasing gasoline > consumption
    does NOT hold gasoline prices up is> short sighted. You are
    trying to tell me that > gasloine hogs have no effect. Try to
    prove it! I'd hate to confuse you with too much reality, but I'll
    ask this: why do you suppose that the per-barrel price of oil has
    more of an effect on gasoline prices than any other metric? Oh,
    that's right, you don't believe that it does. Nevermind. With that,
    I am done with this conversation.

  • mhagle 8/27/2006 12:00:00 AM

    I get 50 mpg driving to work in my 1997 Geo Metro. My husband
    bought it for me last year when the gas prices went up. He found it
    on the Internet for $1600. I love it.I remember in the 70s when
    there was an energy crisis. It seems like the general population
    took it more seriously than they do now. Why is that?I have been
    guilty too. Just last week I thought, "My goodness . . . this is
    Texas and it is over 100 degrees outside . . . why not hang my
    clothes out on the line? They will dry in about 5 minutes!" So I
    found some rope and strung it between a couple of trees.Time to
    stop and bring in some sheets and hang out the next load!

  • RAY KORNELE 8/27/2006 12:00:00 AM

    > plastic is made from oilPlastic is made from the
    by-products of oil- what willnot crach into gasoline. It has no
    effect on thegasoline market.> I get 50 mpg driving to work in
    my 1997 Geo MetroVery likely But, that's not a Hummer, or big
    engine4wheel drive (which are gaining in numbers).> believing
    that a few million SUV drivers in the US has> that large of an
    effect on world-wide oil prices is> short-sighted at bestNo,
    believing that increasing gasoline consumption doesNOT hold
    gasoline prices up is short sighted. You aretrying to tell me that
    gasloine hogs have no effect.Try to prove
    it!KrazyKyngeKorny

  • RAY KORNELE 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    > You stated earlier that the "rich" people who >drive
    SUVs are the reason oil is so expensive, >which shows a
    fundamental misunderstanding of >the oil marketThis proves that
    you lack understanding of supply and demend, which is the monetary
    rule that drives ALL profit motivated markets, including the oil
    market. They are not special, but they act like it. Gas prices are
    NOT driven by Arabs. They are driven by how much the American
    public will shell out. To deny this does not show sound
    reasoning.KrazyKyngeKorny(Just krazy- not stupid)

  • RAY KORNELE 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    Then, you are not part of the problem. About the 55mpg? I
    believe it. IO had a '51 Chevy (the old small 6cyl- a mid size
    model) w/aftermarket OD. It got 45mpg- no acceleration in OD, but
    much gas mileage.KrazyKyngeKorny

  • RAY KORNELE 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    > Since we created the standard that is causing global>
    warming, we need to begin a new standard for> environmentally
    friendly means of transportation.You need to convince the oilk
    companies and thepoliticians (Republican and Democrat alike. They
    areboth invested in oil, oil, and oil. Dubby ain't
    alone).KrazyKyngeKorny

  • TOM Beasley 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    One aspect of the problem with rising gas prices that hasn't
    been discussed here is the current trend of over a billion Chinese
    swapping their bikes for automobiles. As the economies of China and
    India continue to advance, more and more of their populations will
    opt for the high-life. For years we have set the standards for
    extravagant living. One of the side benefits of out-sourcing our
    jobs abroad is, as these other countries’ economies improve, all of
    us get to pay more for oil.Since we created the standard that is
    causing global warming, we need to begin a new standard for
    environmentally friendly means of transportation. Good old Yankee
    ingenuity got us to where we are today. Maybe it’s time to get
    really creative and set a new gold standard for a new millennium.A
    video of one such alternative means of transportation, a
    human/electric hybrid that is currently available - one that is
    both peddled and powered by electricity - can be found here:
    http://media.putfile.com/Aerorider . Also, Mother Earth New’s own
    3VG, [with upgrading (e.g. Electrically powered using a series of
    capacitors? - A capacitor is a device that stores an electrical
    charge or energy on it's plates, does not have a liquid medium,
    charges in a fraction of the time of a battery, weighs much less
    than a battery and can be charged indefinite number of charges)].
    Students at Brigham Young University modified GM’s EV1 with a bank
    of 160 ultra capacitors and timed on a one-quarter-mile drag strip
    at an official competition of the National Electric Drag Racing
    Association (NEDRA) to prove the viability of such a system(see:
    http://www.earthtoys.com/emagazine.php?issue_number=04.04.01&article=dragster
    ).These are but two possibilities. The 3VG could become a real
    sleeper with some upgrades.

  • BROAF Oaf 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    According to a study cited by fueleconomy.gov, "as a rule of
    thumb, you can assume that each 5 mph you drive over 60 mph is like
    paying an additional $0.20 per gallon for gas."Do 55 mph and
    accelerate slowly and you're set. I drive a 2-door, Hyundai Accent,
    manual, and my record is 55 miles per gallon (yes, fifty-five,
    that's not a
    typo).(http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml , last
    accessed 26-08-2006)

  • Scotch 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    Heh. What about the rich who buy gas guzzlers? The last I
    checked, the US was a free country, and we can usually buy what we
    want if we can afford it. Even though I disagree with those who buy
    SUVs for no good reason, I defend their right to do so. I know I
    don't want to live in a place where I am told I can only buy
    certain products - that's a very dangerous place.You stated earlier
    that the "rich" people who drive SUVs are the reason oil is so
    expensive, which shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the oil
    market.Besides, this isn't about being frugal, necessarily; some of
    us actually care about the environment, and ensuring a clean, safe
    future for our children.

  • Scotch 8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM

    >> You stated earlier that the "rich" people who >>
    drive SUVs are the reason oil is so expensive, >> which shows
    a fundamental misunderstanding of >> the oil
    market--------------------> This proves that you lack
    understanding of supply and demend, which is the monetary rule that
    drives ALL profit motivated markets, including the oil
    market.TBeasley already rebutted for me as far as the developing
    world going for gas-powered vehicles, but also consider that
    plastic is made from oil, and people from all over the world crave
    more and more exotic things from other corners of the planet, which
    needs to be shipped, which takes a great deal of oil. And those are
    but a few reasons why oil prices are up, without even touching on
    speculators in the market, and perceived scarcity of the product in
    question.> Gas prices are NOT driven by Arabs. They are driven
    by how much the American public will shell out. To deny this does
    not show sound reasoning. Reason has little to do with this
    conversation. Ignoring what the developing world is doing, and
    believing that a few million SUV drivers in the US has that large
    of an effect on world-wide oil prices is short-sighted at
    best.FWIW, my car gets its best mileage between 60 and 75 mph, and
    NO A/C. ;)

Add Your Comment

You can use this comment form to enter your personal experiences or additional information and resources that you'd like to share with Mother Earth News readers. Your helpful advice will be posted on this page.  E-mail addresses are never displayed on comments, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New to Mother Earth News?
Sign up to share comments.
Asterisks(*) indicate required fields.
Name*
Your name appears next to your comment.

E-mail Address*
This will be your login ID.

City State Zip Code

Password*


Confirm Password*

Comments
(Offensive materials and/or spam will be removed, no HTML allowed)
Please Note: Your sign-up must be verified via e-mail before your comment is published.


Pay Now & Save 66% Off the Cover Price
Save More Money & Trees!

Pay with a credit card now and take advantage of our Earth-Friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save a total of $9.95 and get 6 issues of Mother Earth News for only $10.00 (USA only).

Mother Earth News offers you practical information on cutting energy costs, do-it-yourself home improvements, organic gardening, self-sufficiency, sustainable technologies and much more!

OR choose the "BILL ME" option and we'll bill you $14.95 for 6 issues of Mother Earth News. That's still a $5 savings off the regular price of $19.95!

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, $15.50 (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, $18.00. U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here