December/January 1999
By Sam Martin
 |
The TOYOTA PRIUS, already in showroms around the country, constantly regulates the power between its 1.5-liter conventional gasoline engine and its electric motor in order to maximize drivability and eficiency. It gets 80 miles to the gallon, 680 miles pertank, and, at$16,500, the Prius is priced to compete.
|
These days there seems to be a surfeit amount of talk on saving the ozone layer with alternative fuels and hybrid engines. So much, in fact, that I keep asking myself if this is just another industry pep rally akin to the hoopla made over electric cars during the OPEC oil crisis in the '70s. Back in 1976, while waiting in gas station lines 20 cars my family would have gladly swapped our Ford Capri for a Sebring-Vanguard electric Citicar, even if its top speed was a sad 32 miles an hour. But we didn't. The technology, the convenience and the price just weren't right.
RELATED CONTENT
Forget electric vehicles and methane-powered cars, here's a truly basic and environmentally sound w...
Toyota announces its second hybrid to be manufactured in the United States. A Mississippi plant wil...
Buses, subways and other modes of mass transit saw an increase in ridership in 2008, as U.S. reside...
Employment opportunities in the U.S. wind power industry increased 70 percent in 2008, and a record...
Representatives Henry Waxman of California and Edward Markey of Massachusetts introduced a bill on ...
So why are today's clean air cars any different? It's not as if the price of gasoline is expensive enough to pry consumers out of their SUVs, even if carbon emissions are at an all-time high. But the fact is the United States uses 17 million barrels of oil per day, nearly half of which is imported. And if you consider that one Boeing 747 burns 6.7 gallons of fuel per mile, it's easy to see why fossil fuel-burning engines are a major health concern not just for the nation, but for the planet.
Which is why the car industry, having been urged on by state and federal legislation, has finally put its money where its mouth used to be. Leading the cheers for cleaner air is, of course, California. The state's Zero Emission Standard of 1993 calls for 10% of California's vehicles to have zero emissions by 2003-that means electric cars only. Arizona, New York and Massachusetts have since signed on and in 1998 the federally sponsored Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century became the biggest public works bill in U.S. history, setting aside $9.1 billion for environmental programs, including those that encourage the use of alternative-fuel vehicles. As we enter the next century, every major auto company has increased the time and money spent on alternative car research.
The HONDA HYBRID, first offered for sale at the end of 1999, features both an electric motor and a one-liter, three-cylinder engine and averages 70 miles to the gallon.
So far, not only are Toyota, Honda, Fiat, BMW and Audi marketing fuel-saving and hybrid-engine cars, but Chrysler, Ford and General Motors have added clean air cars to their salesrooms in the U.S. What distinguishes this burst of activity from the last go-round is that people are actually buying the cars. And no wonder, given the strides in the technology surrounding hybrid and alternative-fuel engines. These cars are as fast, as cheap and as attractive as piston-engine-only models. Plus, they have near zero emissions and can get up to 70 miles to the gallon.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>