THIS CAR TRAVELS 75 MILES ON A SINGLE GALLON OF GASOLINE!
(Page 3 of 4)
The little car will accelerate from 0 to 60 miles per hour
in a very satisfying eight seconds. Furthermore, under "no
wind" conditions, the automobile can cruise down the
highway at a steady 70 mph ... while carrying a reserve in
its accumulators that will push it on up to higher speeds
for a short distance. And it does all this on a maximum
fuel consumption of .9 gallons per hour ... which works out
to a shade better than 75 miles per gallon. (Are you paying
attention, Detroit?)
RELATED CONTENT
MOTHER'S CHILDREN: STENCIL STATIONARY November/December 1989 When this 10-year-old wanted a new bik...
Methane fuel pollutes very little, but it takes much more methane than gasoline to operate a vehicl...
Guide to removing a vehicle lodge in a soft surface, including keeping the proper equipment handy a...
The Kubota RTV1140CPX has the ability to convert from best-in-class cargo to four-passenger seating...
With a few modifications, you could burn vegetable oil to power your diesel car or truck. People ac...
Still, Ernie's class is quick to point out that its car can
be improved a great deal more. One of the most obvious
refinements, the students say, will be the elimination of
the vehicle's VW transaxle. "We left the transaxle in so we
wouldn't have to redesign the VW chassis's suspension,"
they point out, "which means -since nothing is 100%
efficient-that we've combined the inefficiencies of our
hydraulic drive with the well-known inefficiencies of the
old mechanical drive. If and when we couple our hydraulic
motor directly to the car's wheels, we should realize a
marked improvement in our car's efficiency."
THE SAME, YET DIFFERENT
The Hennepin Tech students' energy storage transmission is,
in some ways, quite similar to Vince Carman's Inertial
Storage Transmission featured in MOTHER NO. 48. Both use
off-the-shelf hardware and well-proven technology. Both
dramatically extend an automobile's gasoline mileage by
capturing, storing in an accumulator, and later using the
energy that ordinary automobiles normally waste during
braking and when they are idled in city traffic with their
engines running.
But the two transmissions are quite different too. Carman,
for instance, uses "fixed displacement" pumps and motors in
his hydraulic drive train because he feels that they're the
most efficient ... while the HVTC student team chose
"variable displacement" hardware because such pumps and
motors are easier to control.
Another major difference: The Portland car's engine is run
at a constant rpm and is turned off as soon as it has
pumped a predetermined pressure into the accumulator in its
hydraulic drive line. In the Minneapolis vehicle, on the
other hand, the engine's rpm is allowed to vary according
to the amount of pressure that is in the drive line's
accumulator and how fast that pressure is being drawn off
... and the powerplant is almost never shut completely down
while the car is moving.