R-values Aren't Always Useful
July/August 2005
Steve Maxwell
R-values are a measure of a material's resistance to heat; the
higher the value, the better the insulative properties. Although
they are a convenient and common yardstick to measure thermal
performance, the usefulness of them is limited.
RELATED CONTENT
The U.S. Department of Energy's work with the city of Greensburg, Kan., over the past year is beari...
. . . ENERGY FLASHES...... ENERGY FLASHES...... ENERGY FLASHES. . . September/October 1982 POPEYE W...
A new study predicts we could have one quarter of our energy needs from renewable sources by 2025, ...
An indoor pool with this system can actually pay for itself in reduced utility bills, including wir...
Which renewable energy technology has the best potential to combat global warming and power our fut...
In a
2000
study by Brock University in Ontario, two almost identical
homes ? one built with a stick frame and the other with Structural
Insulated Panels (SIPs) ? were compared for energy efficiency.
Thermal analysis revealed the 2-by-6 stick frame house (rated at
R-20) performed at an R-4 equivalent, while the 4 1/2-inch-wide SIP
home performed at a true R-17 level in 13-degree
temperatures.
The reason for the wide discrepancy is because, unlike frame
systems, SIPs offer continuous insulation values across large areas
of airtight walls, unbroken by studs that would otherwise conduct
heat and let cold air into the building. In terms of real-world
energy conservation, the SIPs home consumed only a quarter as much
energy over one year as its stick-built counterpart, even though
R-value ratings were comparable.