Mother's $10-per-square-foot (or less!) Earth Sheltered House: Part III

Enlarge Image Image Gallery STAFF PHOTO

Article Tools

Image Gallery

Print

E-mail

Comments

RSS

Is is possible to achieve food and energy independence on one acre? Well, with imagination,hard work, and the right one acre, we think it can be done . . .and that's what this project is all about. Of course, providing most of the basic needs for four people from such a small piece of ground is a tall order. Still, we think it's a goal worth pursuing, and we're hoping that in this series of articles about our low-cost homestead we'll be able to help some of you in your struggles to increase your self-reliance . . . by doing some of the experimenting for you.

In previous installments, we discussed both our plans for the project and the construction of the building's shell. This time around, we'll gooney the important tasks of waterproofing and insulation, and also describe a couple of the home's special energy-saving details.

Effective waterproofing is crucial to the longevity of any earth-sheltered building, and leakage problems have traditionally been the major complaint voiced by owners of such structures. Fortunately, there are numerous quality waterproofing systems on the market today, two of which we used successfully in our last earth-sheltered building construction project (see "My MOTHER's House", issues 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 77, and 80).

Of course, good commercial waterproofing systems are expensive . . . but, in general, they're probably the wisest expenditure you can make when building an underground home. However, for our ultra-low-cost earth shelter, we decided to take a risky but very inexpensive approach. As an experiment, we chose to use two applications of an asphalt-bentonite compound in conjunction with a layer of 6-mil polyethylene. The total cost of the adhesive and the plastic was less than 15 ¢ per square foot of wall . . . as opposed to the $1.00 per square foot (or more) price tag on proven commercial systems.

We probably won't know whether this gamble was completely successful for years to come. So far, at least, the building's walls haven't leaked. Over the years, however, the asphalt could gradually dissolve in the water around the walls. In the meantime, we do not recommend that you follow our lead with this system. We can afford to risk having to pull out the backfill and install another waterproofing material . . .and this experiment is one way we can serve you, our readers. But we doubt that most folks would be willing to gamble with us. (Up dates on the system's performance will appear in future issues of this magazine.)

RSS | Comments | E-mail | Print