HOT TOPICS >> Thanksgiving • Winter chickens • Facebook • DIY greenhouses • Pumpkin seeds

This question is one of the most frequently asked in the industry, and also the question that makes most solar installers very uneasy — not because they don’t want to give you a forthright answer, but because the correct answer for any individual will depend on a number of variables that dramatically affect the price.

For example, is your home on-grid or off-grid? If it’s off grid, you will need additional equipment such as a charge controller, monitors and storage batteries. Next you will need to figure out how much energy your home will use and how much storage (number of batteries) you will need. The size of your system and battery bank will depend on how much sun your location receives (solar insolation) and how many consecutive days overcast conditions may keep your system from producing energy. More than likely, you will want to add a backup engine-generator to your system rather than having to size your battery bank to meet the worst-case scenario. A generator will also help you maintain the health of your battery bank, safeguarding a large part of your investment.

Most off-grid homes need to be very energy-wise to keep costs for a solar energy system within bounds. Although if the utility grid is located more than one-half mile away, even a fairly large solar-electric system will cost less than having the utility bring in power. To keep system costs down, the quick rule here is that every dollar spent on saving energy, such as using low wattage, compact fluorescent light bulbs and installing energy saving appliances, will save $5 or more on solar generating equipment. Some types of appliances, such as clothes dryers, electric ranges and most air conditioning units are simply altogether impractical.

For an on-grid system, the key factor to understand is what your goals are. Are you looking for self-reliance during grid outages? If yes, your system will cost a little more for batteries and a charging system, sized according to how many days of autonomy you might need before grid energy is available again.

Or is your goal a zero-energy home — where your solar-electric system offsets all of your energy use on an annual basis? Or are you just interested in doing your part for the environment by producing as large a portion of your electricity as you can afford, or for which you have space that you can allot to energy generation? In any case, the starting point is to look at your utility bill and find out how many kilowatt-hours you use on average each day.

Many people mistakenly think that the size of their home is a major factor in determining the size of their solar-electric system. In fact, a home’s size is mostly irrelevant. The size of your system and its costs will depend on how much electricity you use and where you live. For example, a 2 kW system in Minnesota will produce very different results than the same system located in Arizona. A home with an electric water heater and electric range will use more electricity than a home with a tankless water heater and gas stove.

The size of your system and its costs will depend on how much of your electrical usage you want to offset and also how good the solar resource is in your area. A number of tools to determine this information are available on the Web, but the best noncommercial site is the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL) PV Watts calculator.

Take a look at the generic examples in the accompanying table and you will see a huge variance in system costs. Getting a grasp on the difference between the sizes shown in the table is not very easy because of all the variables. What size system would you need? Sizing a system can and should be a very detailed process. For general purposes of establishing some “ballpark figures,” most systems installed in the United States are in the range of 2 to 5 kW, with systems larger than 5 kW being exceptionally large, and systems below 2 kW being fairly modest. To put it into a more human perspective, consider my circa 1937, 3,000-square-foot farmhouse in the Pacific Northwest, which has a 2.1 kW system on a pole-mounted tracker in the backyard. Although we use an electric hot water heater and electric stove, all of the lighting and other appliances are energy efficient models, and we are obsessively energy conscious. Our annual electrical usage each year is a miserly 4,800 kilowatt-hours, of which 75 percent is produced by the solar-electric array.

The average cost across the country for a professionally installed system is about $8 to $9 per watt, with batteries adding an additional 20 to 30 percent to the cost. If you are a handy do-it-yourselfer, you can save around $2 per watt, but your system may be more difficult to certify for incentives.

The table does not include federal, state, and utility incentives and rebates that may be available to you, sometimes reducing the overall cost by as much as 50 percent. Another factor to consider is whether your state and utility have favorable net metering regulations — the rate and methods by which your electric utility purchases your excess electricity production and credits your utility bill. Some places have wildly favorable incentives, while a few locations are much less enthusiastic about embracing renewable energy.

Currently the best federal residential solar incentives ever in existence (30 percent) are available for home energy systems, so there’s not likely a better time than the present to think about installing renewable energy on your home. If you consider your investment as purchasing all or part of your electricity in advance for the next 25 years or more, the upfront costs can make excellent financial sense, especially if you believe that the cost of electricity will continue to rise during that same period.

Average Costs of a Home Solar-Electric System*

System Type

2 kW
(small/average)

5 kW
(average/big)

10 kW
(gigantic)

Off-grid

$20,800

$52,000

$104,000

Grid-intertied

$16,000

$40,000

$80,000

On-grid with battery backup

$19,200

$48,000

$96,000

* Professional installation costs before incentives

— Linda Pinkham, former managing editor of Home Power magazine

Comments

  • Harry Nielsen 6/19/2009 10:50:44 AM

    I moved to Uganda a few years ago, where even in the capital electricity is a sometime thing and upcountry in many places non existent. At the same time there are 600,000 vehicles on the roads. We came up with a very inexpensive solution we call the PowerStation which provides free electricity for those who drive a car. Basically drive an hour a day and have free power all night.

    How the PowerStation works is we use the alternator to charge an on board inverter system which includes a separate battery. This is free electricity as the car uses no additional fuel. It is far cheaper to install than a comparable solar system, causes no additional pollution as the vehicle is being used for transportation anyway and there is no ongoing costs as with an inverter system for grid power or a generator for fuel. It has the added advantage that you have electricity wherever the vehicle travels. We have put it on large SUVs to sub compacts with the same success.

    As a supplement to grid power or as a sole source for a small house it is great. For a 1KW system which is sufficient to power for 4 to 6 energy saving lights, a 21" TV (or small fridge) and a laptop for 6 to 8 hours, we charge about $1,000 including installation.

    With over a billion cars on the roads of the world, we could make a major dent in the need for grid power plants without causing any additional pollution. For more information you can access our website at www.aaes-ltd.com. My email address is harry@aaes-ltd.com

    We are looking for dealer and distributors around the world to bring the technology out. We are also looking for investors. I believe you will find it is the least expensive alternative energy solution by far.

    My direct email address is harry@aaes-ltd.com, if anyone wants additional information

  • sherry majors 6/12/2009 6:49:05 AM

    I would love to go solar and wind, but there is no way I can afford this I live on disability, My 2 sons and I homestead raise most of our own food, but the co-op that sells us our electric keeps us in the whole, is there any help out there for the poor to go solar?

  • Linda Paloff 6/9/2009 10:02:45 AM

    I am very interested in learing as much as possible about solar energy. For many years Mother has been my go to place for answers about many subjects and I just wanted to thank you for the hours of enjoyment and learning I have received from this great magazine.

  • Scott Cronk 6/1/2009 9:35:24 PM

    www.Solar-Estimate.org offers some nice solar estimating tools. For solar electric (PV), solar water and solar pool heating.

  • Linda Pinkham 5/29/2009 9:30:23 PM

    Hello everyone,

    Thank you for your comments. I wanted to address the notion about the high cost of solar electricity compared to utility-provided electricity. What most of us don't realize is that the utilities have been highly subsidized by our government. How much do you think that it really costs to build a coal-fired power plant (in this case, thinking about dollars, not health). Or how about the real costs of building a hydro dam or a nuclear power plant?
    Subsidies for dirty energy are coming to an end. As a result, the price of utility electricity will go up, and the cost comparison for going with solar energy will become very competitive.
    The comment about wind energy being a no-brainer is correct because wind energy has been able to be competitive even against the utilities with all of their subsidies. If you have a wind or micro-hydro resource, that's the most cost-effective source of renewable energy.

  • Dale Murphy 5/29/2009 7:05:30 PM

    Place solar panels on all roofs! I just went solar this February. When you think of the economics of savings over the long run, it is cost effective. From going from an average cost of $240 per month to $.98 for the last three months, I'm sold. People are contacting me asking about its value all the time. One woman commented her electric bill was over $1,000 one month last year. A plant grown from seed takes time to produce fruit. It is just the way "going green" works before you see the benefits to ourselves and our environment. The positive value is infectious and what you do is noticed by others around you as you become the trusted resource. While losing some money in this economy, I still am winning by cutting back, and it is encouraging to be part of the "green group" whether intentional or not.

  • blueyedevil 5/29/2009 1:16:42 PM

    It seems to me that the massive cost and surface area of solar would make wind generation a no-brainer.

  • Bruce K 5/29/2009 9:07:50 AM

    These are good numbers for small residential systems. Yes, large solar farms can install these systems for half the cost and ARE being installed today.

    More and more utilities are passing Feed-In Tariffs (FIT) which pay the household producer for their solar electricity. Solar power is produced during the PEAK demand period, when it cost the utility the most money to bring more power online. Also, by producing the power where it is needed, the cost to install and maintain new transmission lines is reduced.

    http://www.greenterrafirma.com/solar_photovoltaics.html

    And what is the true cost to you and your health, for those large coal fired generators. The Nanticoke generating station has been finger for causing over 400 human deaths per year from the pollution it produces.

    http://greenterrafirma.com/wordpress/what-is-the-real-cost-of-coal/

    It's high time we put solar on the rooftop of a most homes, which can support it.

  • Janet 5/27/2009 6:11:18 PM

    I agree with John, the cost is still way too high for the average family. I would love to have a small solar power system to take a significant percentage of my load. But $20k? There's no way I could find that kind of money. My electric coop is much more efficient at producing electricity than I can. We need to provide incentives (carrots), as well as carbon-caps (sticks) to get our energy industry producing solar and other renewables for us. They can much more easily acheive economies of scale and thereby price reductions than average consumers.

  • George Works 5/24/2009 8:26:25 AM

    Thanks for a fine article, which agrees with my experience.

    My wife and I have a 2.4KW grid-interactive system with batteries which cost about $20,000 to install ourselves three years ago. We live on a tiny Caribbean island where the grid has a lot of outages and power costs about 30 cents/KWH. Our water heater is solar, and the "clothes dryer" is a clothesline. Our stove is propane. For the first year we operated totally off-grid and found the system adequate for our needs.

    Our system is about break-even at present prices. But energy prices will only increase, and probably by a lot over the next decade. And we don't even notice when the grid is off.

  • John Wilson 5/22/2009 2:29:18 PM

    The price/watt with equipment has got to come down if any real conversion from coal fired units is to be expected. On a different note plasma units connected to land fills are significantly able to reduce the land fill load and thereby reduce the stress on the environment. It's different so someone has to step up and make a change.

Add Your Comment

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New to Mother Earth News?
Sign up to share comments.
Asterisks(*) indicate required fields.
Name*
Your name appears next to your comment.

E-mail Address*
This will be your login ID.

City State Zip Code

Password*


Confirm Password*

Comments
1500 character limit (Offensive materials and/or spam will be removed, no HTML allowed)
Please Note: Your sign-up must be verified via e-mail before your comment is published.

Ask your question, get an answer:

Question:
Name:   
City: State:
Email: